I think both Stranger and John Wayne rode off to the same place. The foot of the cross.

I think both Stranger and John Wayne rode off to the same place. The foot of the cross.
Hi Daniel,Daniel12 wrote: โ4 years ago Hi Bruno![]()
I really liked that video.
I'm not sure how it escaped me because this was the first time I've seen it.
Maybe It's because I'm loyal and only look at official Anointed drinks.
https://img.youtube.com/vi/1bbuNsxWkDo/0.jpg
See Stranger,------ all you're gonna miss. All it takes is one laugh to make your day.![]()
So do you think evolution was part of God plan? Some Christians believe life evolved into different species and in different parts of the earth. In other words God created or allowed the Chinese to evolve in Asia. He allowed or created the Blacks in Africa. The Whites in Britain, Jews in Israel, Indians in the Americans and so on. Many are dismissing the Adam and Eve story as being literal. Which is why some countries don't have or use the bible because God didn't provided it in their area. Other books took form like the Koran.each time I feel more and more amazed, that if we did come about by some sort of programmed process, it makes God look like even more of a genius than he already does. Sometimes what we may perceive as being our enemy could in fact turn out to be our best friend.
Hi Daniel,Daniel12 wrote: โ4 years ago Hi BrunoSo do you think evolution was part of God plan?each time I feel more and more amazed, that if we did come about by some sort of programmed process, it makes God look like even more of a genius than he already does. Sometimes what we may perceive as being our enemy could in fact turn out to be our best friend.
Maybe humans need to evolve into better beings and qualify before they are given an opportunity to live forever.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/12 ... 191019.jpg
Now this book is interesting in that it shows how evolution falls short of giving a coherent explanation for the diversity of races on earth. Itโs just a big story of adaptation base on random selection.To make polygenism compatible with the Biblical account in the early chapters of the Book of Genesis, some argument is needed to the effect that what is in the Bible is incomplete. Three standard positions are:
โข Pre-Adamism;
โข Co-Adamism;[9]
โข incompleteness of the Table of Nations in Genesis 10.
One of these positons--Co-Adamism claims that there was more than one Adam or small groups of men, created at the same time in different places across the Earth, and therefore that the different races were separately created.
In 1591 Giordano Bruno argued that because no one could imagine that the Jews and the Ethiopians had the same ancestry, then God must have either created separate Adams or Africans were the descendants of pre-Adamite races.
An anonymous Biblical paper supporting co-Adamism was published in 1732 entitled Co-adamitae or an Essay to Prove the Two Following. Paradoxes, --That There Were Other Men Created at the Same time with Adam,
Anyway, I just started researching this theory.Henry Home, Lord Kames was a believer in co-Adamism. Home believed God had created different races on Earth in separate regions. In his book Sketches on the History of Man in 1734 Home claimed that the environment, climate, or state of society could not account for racial differences, so that the races must have come from distinct, separate stocks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests