Uni Professors Promoting Adult-Child Sex

[Proselytiser of Jah]

This has been going around in some corners I've noticed. It's on various news sites and there is footage as evidence.

Some College and University professors are trying to justify pedophillia. This is something I've seen a long time coming.



Matthew 10:15

[Marina]

Me too. I heard about it first when I was working in a children's home.

The tactic is to make out being labeled a child sex offender is what causes the person to do child abuse in the beginning. Bit like saying 'calling a known adulterer an adulterer is what caused him/her to become an adulterer.' For this reason they want to get rid of sex offenders register in UK. They also want to make out it is a lifestyle choice - it is horrible. Possibly soon, if you say that, you'll be viewed as white supremacist, anti-black, antisemitic blah blah blah - all for saying 'child abuse is wrong.'

Hence the truckers got going, that and they didn't want the vacc which never passed the animal experimentation stage.

[Proselytiser of Jah]

They also want to make out it is a lifestyle choice - it is horrible. Possibly soon, if you say that, you'll be viewed as white supremacist, anti-black, antisemitic blah blah blah - all for saying 'child abuse is wrong.'

Exactly.

I expected it to happen because this is the logical end conclusion when we start saying "I'm born this way" as a justification for all of our behaviours. It begins to question what objective morality is, on the basis of one's so-called "nature". It's why we need a higher objective source of ethics, because if we base all morality on one's "nature", especially our imperfect nature, then it will lead to what we see today.

This is how Satan is an "angel of light". It looks good on the surface, and some of it is (for example, it's wrong to be racist, as that's hating someone for the natural in-born colour of their skin, which means nothing), but then this reasoning begins to be attached to other "in born things", which are not quite on the same level of "nature" as something like skin colour, and is in fact harmful, for in reality it's a perversion of nature, like being born with a disease, but the disease is made to look "natural" or even "preferable".

[Marina]

Yes, its a values and priorities thing. The Bible says to flee from fornication. Is that a value someone lives by?

They have an alphabet - LBGTQRST whatever. But they say the P is silent - or it has been.

What they don't say is that it starts with A - for adultery (or F). But if you look back at the role Richard Burton and Liz Taylor played with their on off marriage and taboo breaking, that's where the propaganda made in-roads into traditional family values. After that there was a tendency to not be so tough on homosexuals because some people in high places had been found out as unfaithful in their marriages and were no longer able to cover over.

Taboo breaking was a concept from Sigmund Freud, used by he nephew Bernays who used glamour as part of his propaganda. Christians who turn to Freud and his followers for answers are following blind guides. And as you are saying PoJ they are even pointing to those who advocate in favor of behavior Jehovah abhors.

The word 'taboo' is not 'sin'. It is a tribal term but not the tribes of Israel. Freud looked to Egyptian paganism. Jung looked to Gnosticism. From the followers of these men come today's criminologists. Clever with words, powerful with influence.

Psychologists do not accept any criticism not even the expressing of justified doubts, terming these neurotic resistance. Does it sound like a Governing Body you know? 2+2=5 if they say so?