This is the place to discuss anything to do with scriptural doctrine. It is the primary purpose of this site, and most discussions will be here.
Forum rules
Matt 18:6; Eccl 7:9; 1 Pet 4:8 (If you're not sure what they say then please hover over them with your mouse or look them up in your own Bible before posting)
-
FriendlyDoggo
- Posts: 293
- Joined: 11 months ago
#51
Post
by FriendlyDoggo » 7 months ago
Stranger wrote: ↑7 months ago
Samson is named with many a great prophets, if he be guilty shall these be guilty too (Heb 11:32) ?
Hi Stranger, I wasn't laughing of Samson, but of WT awful attempt to change the history.

My english isn't very good, sorry any inconvenience.
-
Stranger
- Posts: 2569
- Joined: 4 years ago
#52
Post
by Stranger » 7 months ago
FriendlyDoggo wrote: ↑7 months ago
Hi Stranger, I wasn't laughing of Samson, but of WT awful attempt to change the history.
Hi FD,
No, I didn't think you were laughing at Samson. It wouldn't be too far fetched to say however, you would have laughed with him if you ever heard him tell a riddle.
Since you say they've attempted to change history, what has that done for your future? (Jdg 14:14)
Stranger, (2Thes 3:8)
-
Bobcat
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: 8 years ago
#53
Post
by Bobcat » 7 months ago
Incidentally, Heb 11:32 is the only direct mention of Samson in the NT.
You might find
Constable's Expository Notes on Judges chapter 14 (
here) illuminating in how it paints Samson.
Bobcat
-
Bobcat
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: 8 years ago
#54
Post
by Bobcat » 6 months ago
The CLAM for the week of 1/31/22 discusses the WT's idea of "new scrolls" from Rev 20:12. For visitors, see the two links at point # 7 in
this post for some discussion of these "scrolls."
Bobcat
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests